The Amputee Coalition of America is working to introduce federal legislation to protect access to prosthetic care and needs your help...

Eight states have passed prosthetic parity legislation. There are currently 30 states advancing prosthetic coverage bills, including New York. ACA working with a strong campaign committee to advance legislation at the state level. You can find more information about the New York campaign HERE...

The ACA is pursuing a number of New York lawmakers to be original co-sponsors of the prosthetic parity bill. New York will play an important role in the federal effort. Rep. Towns, Rep. Engel, Rep. Weiner and Rep. Fossella are all on the House Energy & Commerce Committee. Towns, Engel and Weiner are also on the Health subcommittee. Rep. McCarthy, Rep. Bishop, Rep. Clarke and Rep. Kuhl are all on the House Education & Labor Committee. McCarthy and Clarke are also on the HELP subcommittee. Senator Clinton is on the Senate HELP committee. While she is busy running for president, she will still be an important part of this debate.

UPDATE 1/7/2008: Councilwoman Dickens form e-mail response (see below) is that, at her request, the City Planning Commission has extended the official comment period on these amendments to 2/6/2008, the day after the next CB7 hearing. While she has not taken a position yet on the amendments, the community feedback seems to be making a difference and your continued attention to this matter will be helpful.

Despite new neighborhood zoning rules having just gone into effect, Mayor Bloomberg's Planning Commission is proposing a backdoor citywide redefinition of the zoning law written by the New York City chapter of the American Institute of Architects that will allow developers to circumvent existing building "limit definitions" and permit more building on side streets and major avenues than the newly-adopted code currently allows.

Community Boards and organizations throughout the city were notified about these changes the week before Christmas and given only until January 7th to comment on the changes. A prompt and strong response is in order.

Some of the AIA's proposed changes (which you can read HERE), are rather technical and may arguably be beneficial to community residents and developers alike. The AIA insists vehemently that the changes will not add floor area to buildings. However, there are numerous problems with a number of the provisions, including a potential "Domino Effect" (described HERE) where a new, taller building on a block could provide a legal precedent for even more new, tall buildings on the block.

Regardless, the fact that these proposals are being rammed through during the holidays with little opportunity for community feedback should raise red flags. And a Community Board 7 meeting last month with a pair of totally unprepared AIA reps (described HERE) only underscores the point.

Write and call your Council Members and tell them to vote NO on the American Institute of Architects Zoning Text Amendments. Upper Westsiders should contact Councilpersons Inez Dickens and Melissa Mark Viverito:

Inez Dickens
250 Broadway
New York, NY 10007
212-788-7397
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it

Melissa Mark Viverito
250 Broadway
New York, NY 10007
212-788-6960
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it

UPDATE (cont'd): Councilwoman Dickens' response to my e-mail:

Dear Neighbor:

I received your email about the proposed citywide zoning text amendment proposed by the American Institute of Architects. Thank you for contacting me to make your opinion known.

First, it is important for you to know that this proposal is currently NOT before the City Council. This proposal may be before the City Council sometime in March or early April. Prior to its arrival for Council consideration, the proposal can be reviewed and commented upon by New York City's Community Boards, the Borough Board, then formally passed by the City Planning Commission.

However, in spite of this extended schedule, one of the main concerns I received via email and phone on this issue concerned the lack of time to comprehensively review the proposal at the Community Board level. There is a strong concern that this proposal is being pushed through unjustly and that its passage is inevitable. In order to ensure that these concerns were addressed, I called the City Planning Commission and asked that they extend the official comment period from a due date of January 7 for one additional month to February 6, the day after the next full CB7 hearing, for the Community Board. The City Planning Commission granted my request. At last night's CB7 meeting, the Community Board voted to table the resolution they had prepared in opposition to revisit it in their Land Use Committee in January for a Full Board vote in February. This will allow an opportunity for your Community Board to have a more detailed, focused discussion of this matter.

In emails and phone calls, I have received comments both in favor and against the AIA zoning text amendments. Since we are at an early stage in the review process on these proposed changes and much can change as the proposal moves through the City review process on its way to the City Council, I am not stating an official position on the AIA's amendment at this time. I have heard your comments and will take them under consideration. I also plan to reach out to AIA to express your reservations about their proposed amendment. Be assured that any zoning text changes that adversely affect rezoning projects along with the character of neighborhoods in my district and throughout our city will be viewed with a critical eye and due diligence at the City Council.

Please accept my wishes for a happy, safe and prosperous New Year!

Inez E. Dickens
New York City Council
9th District, Manhattan

Representative Robert Wexler (FL-19) has already gotten over 100,000 signatures to help him convince his Democratic colleagues that the American people truly support impeachment hearings. That number was reached within the first 48 hours the petition was online. So let's see if we can get it to 500,000! Please sign his petition and forward the link to your lists:

WexlerWantsHearings.com

Two other members of the Judiciary Committee, Luis Gutierrez (IL-04) and Tammy Baldwin (WI-02), have also joined Wexler in calling for Judiciary Committee Impeachment Hearings to begin against Vice President Cheney.

Call Rep. Nadler: (202) 225-5635

We have one other Member of the House Judiciary Committee from New York who needs to hear from us! Where is Jerry Nadler? Call Rep. Jerrold Nadler (NY-8) and ask why he is still refusing to ask for hearings.

(a message from DFNYC members Dana Northcraft and Michael Minn)

Update 4/1/08: Although hearings were held earlier in the year and the legislation did receive some publicity, the bills do not seem to be getting any momentum, probably due either to a lack of support in the House or because the Republican minority in the Senate (in the absence of a positive agenda) has proven fabulously successful in filibustering everything they don't like. So Arbitration Fairness may have to wait for a more democratic...and more Democratic Congress.

In July of 2005, Jamie Leigh Jones, an employee of Halliburton subsidiary KBR who worked at Camp Hope in the Iraqi Green Zone, claims that she was drugged, brutally raped by multiple KBR firefighters and then held captive in a shipping container for almost 24 hours. Jones managed to call her father in Texas, who then contacted his Congressman, Republican Ted Poe, who called the State Department, who finally dispatched officers from the U.S. Embassy to rescue Jones. Jones was examined by Army doctors, but the "rape kit" mysteriously disappeared after being handed over to KBR security. (ABC News)

All of this would have been horrific enough, but because American contractors in Iraq are being permitted to operate outside of US or Iraqi law, Jones will never be able to pursue criminal charges against her rapists. And, because Jones's employment contract with KBR included a Binding Mandatory Arbitration clause, KBR is arguing that Jones' civil action must be moved into private arbitration, making it very likely that Jones will never get any kind of justice or be able to hold her rapists or employer accountable for their actions. Essentially, KBR is using this clause to cover up the crime.

While this specific case involves multiple layers of outrage and, thankfully, is getting some airing in the court of public opinion, the problems with Binding Mandatory Arbitration clauses are shared by millions of Americans. The Arbitration Fairness Act ( H.R. 3010 / S. 1782) currently being considered by Congress would ban Binding Mandatory Arbitration clauses in employment contracts like Ms. Jones' as well as most other consumer, franchise, and securities contracts.

We encourage you to read more about this issue and then contact your Congresspersons and ask them to cosponsor and/or support the Arbitration Fairness Act.