|
DFNYC Community
|
New York Ranked 9th Greenest State by Forbes |
|
Written by Michael Minn
|
|
Wednesday, 17 October 2007 |
|
(a message from DFNYC member Michael Minn)
Forbes Magazine (not exactly a liberal publication) has
issued a ranking of states by "Greenness", in terms of humans' impact on the environment, including
consumption patterns, air and water quality, and waste, as well as public policy. Not surprisingly, the densely-populated, highly-Democratic, mass-transportation-loving Northeast garners many of the top rankings with Deanville getting
the top ranking:
1. Vermont
2. Oregon
3. Washington
4. Hawaii
5. Maryland
6. Connecticut
7. New Jersey
8. Rhode Island
9. New York
New York State's high ranking is explained:
New Yorkers (at least in the city) rely on public transportation and live and work in tight quarters--
both great things for the environment. No, the air and water quality in the city is not so good, but
overall the state has an exceptionally low carbon footprint (fifth best in the country), second lowest
consumption of energy per capita and the fewest vehicle miles traveled (again, per capita) by its residents
--another advantage of not owning a car in New York City. New York is also part of the regional effort in the
Northeast to establish a market-based system to limit greenhouse gas emissions.
Also not surprisingly, the bottom of the list is dominated by "Red" or "Purple" states.
Yeah, your cost of living may be lower and you don't have union dues, but you get what you pay for.
46. Mississippi
47, Louisiana
48. Alabama
49. Indiana
50. West Virginia |
|
Last Updated ( Wednesday, 17 October 2007 )
|
|
|
Is FreshDirect Anti-Labor? |
|
Written by Michael Minn
|
|
Friday, 12 October 2007 |
|
(A message from DFNYC members Bernadette Evangelist and Michael Minn)
FreshDirect is a company that allows New York City shoppers to order groceries
online and have them delivered directly to their home. While there are questions
about environmental effects of large fleets of idling trucks delivering overpackaged
groceries to a limited group of affluent neighborhoods, for those New Yorkers with
more money than time, it is a helpful service.
But the clean white trucks and efficient service hide a possibly darker
side. In the 9/28/07 edition of the Daily News,
Juan Gonzalez reported that two FreshDirect warehouse workers
were fired within days after it became publicly known they were
attempting to organize fellow workers under the auspices of Teamsters Local 805.
Warehouse workers start at $7.60 an hour in the first year, rising to $8.25 in the
second with differentials for work at night or in refrigerated areas.
Workers claim they are often forced to work 12 or 14 hour days and
are suspended when they refuse.
Company officials responsed to accusations of union-busting that one of the
employees was dismissed for being drunk on the job and the other for repeated absences.
Although the company often attempts to appear agnostic with regards to the unionization
effort, copies of flyers distributed by the company that were
covered in the NY Times read:
FreshDirect is growing and performance is improving, but we have yet to have a profitable year,
and investors have yet to recoup any of the millions of dollars invested...Union jobs are
disappearing; the best and fastest growing companies are union-free, where employees work with
management so everyone can be successful. Be smart: don't sign a union authorization card.
Another flyer warned workers that union dues could be up to $400 per year in after-tax
pay and that:
Unions can't guarantee anything, except that you will pay their dues.
Hardly an indication that they are a progressive company, regardless of
publicised initiatives to be more environmentally conscious.
Legendary hard-nosed recruiting tactics by the Teamsters as well as a reputed turf war
between the Teamsters and the UFCW makes it difficult to figure out what is true or
right in this situation. So one of our members decided to write FreshDirect and
express her concerns:
Attn: Mr. Jim Moore, VP for Business
Dear Mr. Moore,
As a customer and advocate of workers' rights, I was distressed to
read about the situation at your LIC warehouse. I hope you will work
to provide fair and safe working conditions for your employees and
allow their efforts to organize and belong to a union.
Your intentions and good will would be demonstrated by reinstating
suspended workers and rehiring Loreto Gomez and Lonnie Powell whose
firings were at best suspect.
FreshDirect is a wonderful idea and service, but it can only work if
everyone benefits from its success.
Yours truly,
Bernadette Evangelist
The form-letter response from the PR department was equally pleasant,
but still carried an obvious anti-union tone:
Dear Bernadette,
Thank you for your note and for being a customer. I assure you that we
care about our employees as we do the food our customers feed their
families. I wanted to respond to your note to Jim Moore, who is
currently out of the office.
The choice of union representation is the choice of employees, not
employers. In Transportation our employees voted to join a union.
So we negotiated in good faith with the elected union and for the last
several months our Transportation employees have been operating under a union
contract. Currently over 400 FreshDirect employees are union members.
The two people you site in your email were fired for job related
performance--one showed up at work drunk, which we can't condone.
There are many things FreshDirect does for our employees that union
leaders don't publicize:
- All employees are offered health care coverage after 6 months. Its
good health care. FreshDirect chooses to bear a significant portion of the
healthcare costs of our employees and "single" healthcare coverage is
currently offered for as low as $5 per week. We are proud to offer our
employees reasonably priced healthcare choices.
- We run a free employee shuttle from the 7 train subway stop close to
FreshDirect. We run that shuttle 24 hours a day. It offers a little
extra safety and security to our employees with the 24 hour nature of
our business.
- All employees receive 20% off their purchases from FreshDirect---
off of our already low prices. 20% off of our President's Picks sale prices.
Lower prices than most of our employees' neighborhood markets, and
better, fresher food too.
- We offer all employees in our plant hot meals for just $4. Every day.
- We offer a 401K.
- NY City just gave us a $250,000 training grant to further develop our
employees and build their skill base. We are currently developing and
implementing the training programs we co-fund with that grant. This
gives our employees further opportunities to grow with-in our company.
And of course, training and skills that are theirs to keep for their
lifetimes.
We work everyday to make improvements in our service for our customers
and employees. I hope these thoughts are helpful to you.
Please do not hesitate to reach out to me if you need anything else.
Sincerely,
Dana Smith
Director of Marketing
So, what should a progressive shopper in New York City do? Hard to say.
Rumors that their customer service department may soon get offshored to
Canada also add a certain irony to the letter. The union organizing effort
continues...stay tuned...or contact them yourself:
Website Contact Form
1-212-796-8002.
|
|
Last Updated ( Friday, 12 October 2007 )
|
|
|
College Cost Reduction Act of 2007 |
|
Written by Aaron Rudelson
|
|
Thursday, 27 September 2007 |
|
Education financing legislation has made its way through the U.S. Senate, House, congressional conference committee and was signed by the president on Sep. 27. While the final version of the bill, H.R. 2669, should be considered a good step, it did take on some serious water in the reconciliation process. Interest rate reductions are still included, though in limited form, Pell Grant increases survived as well as watered-down versions of Income-Based-Repayment and debt forgiveness. Much warranted cuts in loan insurance for private lenders will pay for much of the legislation and will help to reduce the subsidization of corporate lender profits. Here is a summary of some of the more significant provisions.
|
|
Last Updated ( Friday, 28 September 2007 )
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Welcome to DFNYC Community |
|
Written by Heather Woodfield
|
|
Wednesday, 26 September 2007 |
|
Welcome to the new DFNYC website and our new "Community" section. "DFNYC Community" will feature items which are currently being discussed in the DFNYC community - at Linkup, via email, online, or at events around town. Many of our Linkup hosts and DFNYC organizers will contribute to this section, bringing your comments and concerns to our front page. It our hope to have our members benefit from the insights that are often shared one on one, but should be shared with all. We hope you enjoy this new feature. If you have an suggestion or comments, please write to info -at- dfnyc.org (replace -at- with @). |
|
Last Updated ( Friday, 28 September 2007 )
|
|
|
Write Your Friends in California - New GOP Ploy for 2008 |
|
Written by Heather Woodfield
|
|
Wednesday, 26 September 2007 |
|
UPDATE 9/29/07: The LA Times is reporting
on their blog in a followup to an
earlier article in the paper
that the initiative to split California's electoral votes is basically dead
due to, "the resignation of key supporters,
internal disputes and a lack of funds." Although this episode demonstrates the old maxim that
sunlight is the best disinfectant, it should also remind us to remain vigilant
for other dirty tricks that are most certainly in the pipeline for 2008.
WRITE YOUR CALIFORNIA FRIENDS AND SAVE THE 2008 ELECTION
A front group for the California GOP is pushing to get an initiative
on the ballot next summer that would split California's electoral votes
by congressional district. While this sounds like a good first step
towards getting rid of the electoral college and moving to something
like a direct popular vote for president, splitting only the votes of
the nation's largest Democratic state while not splitting other
Republican-dominated states (like the 34 consistently Republican
electoral votes of Texas) is simply an attempt to "steal" the 2008
election. If the "Presidential Election Reform Act" passes, this would
likely result in a loss of around 22 electoral votes - equivalent
to the loss of Illinois, Pennsylvania or Ohio. It could put Giuliani
in the White House...for eight long years.
Complicating matters is the placement of this initiative on the June 2008 state primary ballot, an obscure, low-turnout election during vacation season that will be dominated by party activists and could be won with only a handful of votes.
So what can you do? Personally e-mail or call your Democratic friends that live in California. Make sure they know about the "Presidential Election Reform Act" and make sure they're registered to vote. Then, send them a reminder e-mail on election day, June 3, 2008, to make sure they get out and defeat this initiative.
For more information on the "Presidential Election Reform Act" and the nefarious forces behind it:
www.mediatransparency.org
sfgate.com
www.cnn.com
|
|
Last Updated ( Saturday, 29 September 2007 )
|
|
| | << Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next > End >>
| | Results 64 - 69 of 69 |
|
|
59 days, 20 hours, 46 minutes until the end of the Bush administration.
|